M y entire post last night was explainig how i have the same pc's as you This is a great a-i-o solution ive used for years and im sure when this is ironed out you'll be impressed. Well, hopefully the Devs see this thread. Neither did my old Glary Utilities Portable 2.56. And neither its Glary Tracks Eraser nor its Glary Disk Cleaner take remotely ANYWHERE near 4 minutes. there's something definitely wrong with Wise Care 365.įor example, I installed Glary Utilities Portable 5.69 on that same day. This while Wise Care 365 takes several eternities with the ActiveX category. But, even then, the standalone Wise Registry Cleaner 9.38 takes only 7 seconds with the ActiveX category. I agree that the ActiveX category is the most time-consuming of all the categories. On the standalone Wise Registry Cleaner 9.38, the Fast scan took the aforementioned 13 seconds. I believe I tried both Default and Safe modes and they were pretty much the same. It only had Default, Safe and Custom modes. But, as I recall, it didn't have a Fast scan mode. I no longer have Wise Care 365 installed. I just keep going back to that in the end, ultimately both apps find the same amount of items. Unless it's an optical illusion, I'm tempted to think that the Wise Care 365 Registry Cleaner function scans a ton more Registry Entries than the standalone Wise Registry Cleaner. It appears to be checking a lot of something. I see that it's actually scanning very speedily. Because it's not like the Wise Care 365 Registry Cleaner function is scanning at a crawl on my Dell Optiplex 780. even though ultimately the same amount of items are found by both. while finding the same amount of items? From what I see, I'm tempted to reason that maybe it's that the Wise Care 365 Registry Cleaner function is wayyy more thorough than the standalone Wise Registry Cleaner. (2) Why does the Wise Care 365 Registry Cleaner function take wayyy longer to complete a scan vs. (1) Is Wise Care 365 not meant for older, weak Pentium era computers with Windows XP? and found the SAME 41 items that it took Wise Care 365's Registry Cleaner function 4 minutes and 35 seconds to find. But, the scan does take a noticeably, undeniably LONG time at 4 minutes and 35 seconds! That while the standalone Wise Registry Cleaner took all of 13 seconds. This computer being a much more powerful and quieter computer, the CPU fan does not go into top speed helicopter mode when running a scan with the Registry Cleaner function. Now that I have a Dell Optiplex 780 with an Intel Core 2 Duo processor with 4 Gig of RAM running Windows XP Pro SP3, the other day I again decided to give Wise Care 365 another shot. Yet, the standalone Wise Registry Cleaner ( version) would scan quickly, without a problem and without remotely making my GX280 break a sweat. And the scanning would immediately go into a snail's pace crawl to the point that I would quickly have to abort. As I recall, as soon as I would try the Registry Cleaner function, my GX280's CPU fan would quickly start spinning at top speed, sounding like a helicopter. Last year when I first tried Wise Care 365, it was on my old Dell GX280 Small Form Factor with only a Pentium 4 processor and either 1 or 2 Gig of RAM running Windows XP Home SP3. So what's the deal with Wise Care 365? Does it by any chance require, only work on very fast and powerful computers? Is there a minimum Processor that a computer must have in order for Wise Care 365 to work properly?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |